DIVERSITY
WHY GRUNYA SUKHAREVA'S 1925 PIONEERING RESEARCH WAS NOT CREDITED AS THE DISCOVERY OF AUTISM?
History of autism discovery and developement of tools & gender politics
Ram Kamal
Dr. Grunya Efimovna Sukhareva (1891â1981) was a pioneering Soviet child psychiatrist who is now widely recognized as the first person to scientifically describe what we today call Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Remarkably, her work predated the more famous publications of Leo Kanner (1943) and Hans Asperger (1944) by nearly two decades.
Despite her groundbreaking insights, she remained largely unknown in the Western world for most of the 20th century due to language barriers and the geopolitical isolation of the Soviet Union and being a Jewish born doctor in the Hitlerâs period.
Born in Kyiv to a Jewish family, she founded a school for children with psychological problems in Moscow in 1921. Her work predates the more famous publications of Hans Asperger and Leo Kanner by nearly two decades.
The 1925 Landmark Study
In 1925, Sukhareva published a pioneering paper titled "Schizoid Psychopathies in Childhood," which included six detailed case studies. This paper, revised and published in German in 1926, provided a definition of "schizoid personality disorder" in children that aligns closely with the modern diagnostic criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in the DSM-5.
Sukhareva summarized the condition using five primary factors:
- Peculiar Thought Patterns: A tendency toward abstract and schematic thinking, often combined with absurd pondering that could make the children appear eccentric.
- Autistic Attitude: Children remained aloof from their environment, struggled to adapt or integrate, and often preferred loneliness or fantastic stories over playing with others.
- Emotional Flatness: A certain "flatness and superficiality of feelings".
- Rigid Psyche: A tendency toward "automatism," where children stuck to started work and had difficulty adapting to new situations.
- Physical and Speech Peculiarities: She noted pronounced motor insufficiency (clumsiness and angular movements), linguistic peculiarities, and insufficiently modulated speech.
Research on Girls and Masking
In 1927, she published a follow-up paper focusing specifically on the peculiarities of schizoid psychopathyâs in girls. Notably, she documented a patient who attempted to "mask" her embarrassment with laughter and superfluous movementsâproviding one of the earliest clinical descriptions of what is now called autistic masking.
Etiology and Pathogenesis
Sukhareva concluded that these children belonged to a group of personality disorders that shared features with schizophrenia but differed profoundly in their development and cause. She speculated that the condition stemmed from an "inborn deficiency" of the same systems affected in schizophrenia. By 1930, her research further explored the dynamics of these constitutional psychopaths, noting disorders of affect and associative thinking.
Historical Reception and Legacy
While her work was referenced by early American researchers like Leo Kanner and Louise Despite in the 1930s and 40s, it remained largely unknown in Western Europe and the Anglosphere for decades. Hans Asperger was aware of her research but deliberately omitted citing her in his famous 1944 paper on "Autistic Psychopaths," despite such citations not being prohibited in Germany at the time. Awareness of her pioneering contributions only grew significantly in the West after British psychiatrist Sula Wolff translated her 1925 paper into English in 1996.
Grunya Sukharevaâs 1925 criteria for what she termed "schizoid psychopathy" provided the first comprehensive definition of autism, predating the work of Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger by nearly two decades. Her descriptions are noted for their remarkable alignment with modern diagnostic standards, such as the DSM-5, and they effectively bridged the clinical observations later popularized by the two men.
Comparison with Leo Kanner
Leo Kannerâs 1943 research focused on "classic" or infantile autism, emphasizing a narrow set of symptoms that he believed were distinct from schizophrenia.
- Similarities in Social and Behavioral Traits: Both researchers identified a fundamental "autistic attitude" or "autistic aloneness". Sukhareva described children who remained aloof from their environment and preferred the company of fantasy stories over other children. Similarly, Kanner noted a "powerful desire for aloneness" and a tendency to play alongside rather than with peers. Both also documented a need for sameness and rigidity; Sukhareva called this a "tendency to automatism" and a "rigid psyche," while Kanner termed it an "obsessive insistence on the preservation of sameness".
- Differences in Scope: Kannerâs diagnostic criteria were initially considered very narrow, with very few children qualifying for the diagnosis. In contrast, Sukharevaâs factors were broader, including "obsessive states" and "increased suggestibility".
- Language and Communication: Kanner emphasized echolalia (repeating others) and monotonous reading. Sukhareva also noted linguistic peculiarities and "insufficiently modulated speech," but she specifically highlighted "absurd pondering" and a tendency toward abstract or schematic thought.
Comparison with Hans Asperger
Hans Aspergerâs 1944 work described "autistic psychopaths"âindividuals who often had high intellectual abilities but struggled with social integration.
- Similarities in Physicality and Intellectualism: A major overlap between Sukhareva and Asperger was the inclusion of "motor insufficiency" or clumsiness. While Kanner did not prioritize physical coordination, both Sukhareva and Asperger viewed it as a characteristic trait. They also both identified children who could be "intellectually well-endowed" but appeared eccentric due to their "extravagant and unworldly ideas".
- Societal Perspective: Both researchers saw value in these individuals' unique perspectives. Asperger famously argued that a "dash of autism" was necessary for top scientific or artistic achievements. Sukhareva similarly noted that while some of her patients were ridiculed, their general level of intelligence often placed them "significantly above the rest of the children".
- Historical Connection: It is confirmed through his papers that Asperger was aware of Sukhareva's work. However, he deliberately omitted citing her as a source in his most famous 1944 paper, despite such citations being legal in Germany at the time.
COMPARISON OF WORKS OF SUKHAREVA, KANNER AND ASPERGER
| Feature | Sukhareva (1925) | Kanner (1943) | Asperger (1944) |
|---|
| Primary Focus | Schizoid Psychopathy | Infantile Autism | Autistic Psychopathy |
| Social Traits | Aloofness, preference for fantasy | "Extreme autism," aloneness | "Disturbance of relationships" |
| Motor Skills | Clumsiness, angularity | Not a primary factor | Clumsiness |
| Intellect | Can be significantly above average | Focused on "islets" of ability | Often highly intelligent |
| Communication | "Talking machines," neologisms | Echolalia, monotonous reading | Poor practical understanding |
Sukhareva also stood alone in her early 1927 research regarding autistic girls, noting five main gender-related differences and documenting one of the first known instances of "masking" (using laughter or superfluous movements to hide social embarrassment). Neither Kanner nor Asperger initially found or detailed significant autistic traits in girls during their pioneering years.
What are the common traumas that autistic people experience?
Research and clinical observation indicate that trauma and autism often go hand in hand, as autistic individuals experience a range of stressors and adverse events that are unique to their neurodivergence. These traumas stem from sensory, social, and systemic sources.
Social and Relational Traumas
Autistic individuals are frequently subjected to bullying, emotional harm, and physical abuse. Beyond these common adversities, specific social traumas include:
- Interpersonal Betrayal: Because many autistic people take social interactions at face value and literally believe what others say, social inconsistencies can feel like profound betrayals. For instance, discovering a "best friend" has other close friends can be experienced as a significant interpersonal trauma.
- Social Confusion and Interaction Stress: The struggle to navigate social landscapes often results in extreme stress in response to social interaction and persistent social confusion, which contributes to a sense of being "othered" or marginalized.
- Loss of Autonomy: Many individuals report trauma resulting from a loss of autonomy, where their rights are taken away or they are not allowed to be who they are by those in positions of power.
Sensory and Environmental Distress
The autistic nervous system can be uniquely vulnerable to environmental factors that others might find negligible:
- Extreme Sensory Distress: Autistic individuals may feel their nervous systems are being "assaulted" by sensory input such as overhead lighting, loud noises, strong smells, or the sound of chewing.
- Invalidation of Sensory Needs: This distress is often compounded by emotional harm when others label the individual as "highly sensitive," "being a baby," or telling them to "grow up" rather than acknowledging the physical reality of their sensory overload.
- Rigidity and Change: For many who rely on routine and predictability, sudden changesâsuch as a divorce, a school change, or even a different bus driverâcan be experienced as incredibly traumatizing.
Systemic and Medical Traumas
Historical and modern societal structures have frequently marginalized autistic people, creating a baseline of trauma:
- Autistic Stigma: Narratives that frame the autistic community as a "burden to society" create an environment of non-acceptance and stigma.
- Historical Blame: For decades, the "refrigerator mother" theory traumatized families by blaming parentsâspecifically mothersâfor their child's autism, forcing them into years of painful and unnecessary analysis.
- Harmful Interventions: Some therapeutic practices have been identified as sources of trauma. This includes the "Z-process" (an attachment therapy where children were held against their will) and certain applications of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). Research has suggested that nearly half of respondents exposed to ABA met the diagnostic threshold for PTSD.
Internalized Trauma: Masking and Burnout
The effort required to exist in a neurotypical world leads to specific internal crises:
- Autistic Masking: The process of suppressing natural traits to "fit in" requires exceptional mental effort, leading to cognitive overload.
- Burnout and Restraint Collapse: Constant masking and the effort to conform can lead to autistic burnout, a state of total resource exhaustion. Additionally, "restraint collapse" occurs when an individual who has been masking in a rigid environment (like school) finally "collapses" upon returning to a safe space, often manifesting as a meltdown.
What were the five gender-related differences Sukhareva found in girls?
The sources confirm that Grunya Sukhareva published a paper in 1927 titled The peculiarities of schizoid psychopathies in girls, in which she identified five main gender-related differences. However, while the sources note that these five differences exist, they do not explicitly list the specific content of those five differences.
The sources do provide the following relevant details regarding her research on girls and her broader findings:
- Discovery of Autistic Masking: In her 1927 paper, separate from the five gender differences, Sukhareva documented what is now recognized as one of the first clinical descriptions of autistic masking. She observed a female patient who "strives to mask her embarrassment with laughter, grimaces, and superfluous movements".
- Comparison to General Findings: While the specific gender differences are not listed, the sources provide the five primary factors she used to summarize the condition for all children in her 1925 research:
- a. Peculiar Thought: A tendency toward abstract and schematic reasoning, sometimes involving "absurd pondering".
- b. Autistic Attitude: Remaining aloof from the environment, difficulty adapting to others, and a preference for loneliness or fantasy stories.
- c. Thymopsyche: A flatness or superficiality of feelings.
- d. Special Features: This includes a tendency toward automatism (difficulty switching tasks), impulsive actions, a silly demeanor (rhyming or creating stereotypical words), obsessive states, and increased suggestibility.
- e. Motor and Speech Peculiarities: Clumsiness (motor insufficiency), angular movements, and "insufficiently modulated speech".
Conclusion:
Dr. Hans Asperger and Dr. Leo Kanner were not the first to identify, study, research, or publish articles about autism. Dr. Grunya Sukhareva, published articles in 1925 and 1926 which contain the first academic description of autism in young male and female patients. Being a woman in the 1920s â however well-qualified and educated â likely had much to do with Asperger's (and other's) willingness to disregard, and then take credit, for her work.
Sukharevaâs work not only provided a clinical description of what we now recognize as autism before male colleagues Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger, her research also delved into the existence of gender differences in Autistic presentation.
The "Refrigerator Mother" Theory
The "refrigerator mother" theory is one of the most damaging chapters in the history of psychiatry and autism. It was a dominant psychological theory from the 1940s through the 1960s that blamed a childâs autism on a lack of maternal warmth.
The Origin of the Theory
The term was first coined by Leo Kanner, the psychiatrist who "discovered" autism in the West in 1943. While Kanner initially suggested autism might be innate, he also observed that the parents of his patients often seemed highly intellectual and "cold."
He suggested that these children were kept in a "refrigerator that didn't defrost," implying that the mothersâ lack of emotional engagement caused the child to withdraw into an "autistic shell."
Bruno Bettelheim and "The Empty Fortress"
While Kanner originated the idea, it was Bruno Bettelheim, a professor and child psychologist, who popularized and radicalized it. In his 1967 book, The Empty Fortress: Infantile Autism and the Birth of the Self, he compared the experience of autistic children to that of prisoners in Nazi concentration camps.
- The Claim: He argued that mothers unconsciously harbored a "death wish" for their children.
- The "Cure": Bettelheim advocated for "parentectomy"âthe physical removal of children from their homes to be raised in institutions away from their "pathological" parents.
"Traumatized Families": The Human Cost
The phrase "traumatized families" in this context refers to the profound psychological and social damage inflicted on parentsâspecifically mothersâby the medical establishment.
- Systemic Gaslighting: Mothers who sought help for their children were instead subjected to intense psychotherapy to "uncover" their hidden resentment or frigidity.
- Stigma and Shame: Families were often shunned, and the guilt led to many mothers suffering from severe depression and anxiety.
- Broken Bonds: The practice of "parentectomy" permanently fractured thousands of families, causing lifelong trauma for both the parents and the children who were institutionalized.
The Debunking of the Theory
The theory began to collapse in the late 1960s, primarily due to the work of Bernard Rimland, a psychologist and father of an autistic son.
- Biological Basis: In 1964, Rimland published Infantile Autism: The Syndrome and Its Implications for a Neural Theory of Behavior, which argued that autism was a biological, neurological condition rather than a result of parenting.
- Parental Advocacy: Parents began to organize, forming groups like the National Society for Autistic Children (now the Autism Society of America), to fight back against the blame and demand scientific research.
- Genetic Research: By the 1970s and 80s, twin studies and advances in genetics conclusively proved that autism has a strong hereditary and neurological component.
Modern Perspective
Today, the "refrigerator mother" theory is universally rejected by the scientific community. It is viewed as a cautionary tale of how observer bias and a lack of scientific rigor can lead to the "mother-blaming" that causes deep, unnecessary trauma to families already struggling to find support for their children.